Here's an interesting article where a Tahoe HOA makes remarks about regulating or eliminating fractional ownership in their development to preserve the status of the community. For some time now, HOAs in certain resort areas have put in place conditions, covenants and restrictions (CC&Rs) that prohibit the sale of timeshares within a development. However, the difference between timeshare and fractional is vast. In my opinion, HOA or municipality attempts to regulate fractional are erroneously rooted: (1) in a misunderstanding of the definition of fractional ownership (they think it's timeshare); and (2) in fear that the "caliber of the neighborhood" will degrade due to the influx of fractional buyers perceived as being lower class.
Of course, fractional ownership is NOT timeshare. See my post on March 12, 2008 and the article by fractional owner / attorney John Gosselin. I'm still formulating my reasons why I believe an HOA or municipality probably can not legally eliminate fractional ownership from a development. My initial thoughts are: (1) CC&Rs and zoning ordinances restrict the use of property, not the form of holding title; (2) If such a CC&R or zoning ordinance was passed, it would be overbroad and effect all co-owned property in the development; and (3) attempts to distinguish those fractional owners who have a formal co-ownership system for use from those who don't will be patently discriminatory. If your HOA is considering such amendments to its governing documents please contact me, as I'd be very curious to learn what their justification is. More on this in future posts as I predict that this will be a very hot topic when fractional projects continue to sprout in exclusive gated communities across the nation in resort areas.
As for the fear that here come the fractional buyers and "there goes the neighborhood" - I find this personally distasteful and factually baseless. What evidence is there that fractional ownership would in any way degrade a community? None. In fact, there is ample evidence to the contrary. Many fractional owners actually can afford a whole property in such developments but choose not to put all their eggs in one basket and instead buy multiple fractions in various geographic locales. In addition, fractional ownership has been shown to actually assist the local economy by keeping a second home occupied a higher percentage of the year and thereby keeping local merchants busier in the slow seasons. Remember, that the fractional owners are "owners" not renters or visitors. Owners, even of fractions, take pride of ownership because they have a significant investment at stake.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I couldn't agree more. I've spent the last two years creating yours2share specifically because I think fractional ownership is much better for local communities!
I couldn't agree more. I've spent the last two years creating yours2share specifically because I think fractional ownership is much better for local communities!
Fractional ownership is better for resort communities in many ways. First, it is a more efficient use of natural resources. Instead of six people tearing down forest and building cabins, they all share one cabin. Second, due to higher occupancy ratio of a vacation home, vacationers are physically present more frequently in local shops and restaurants. I'll try to find a nice article written a year or so ago which had a quote from the City Manager of a resort town in Colorado which testified to this very effect.
Gary,
I agree with your observations completely. As a fractional developer in Paris, France, we too have initially found some resistance to this idea. But in reality, once the neighbors see that these are affluent Owners, and not renters, they have embraced the idea.
As you properly note, the article's position was not clearly thought out and reflects a lack of understanding about the concept.
I'm currently going through this with my HOA in Breckenridge, CO; the HOA is attempting to add ammendmant out lawing our quartershare arrangement as well as trying to state we are in vilation as a "timeshare". the HOA also states in their newly defined ammendment, that our arrangement causes excessive abuse to common areas, which is wrong, since full time owners actually use the property more than my quartershare group.
Post a Comment